NEA data
The most interesting parts.
Page 22
page 28
page 29
page 33
page 48
page 56
page 63
page 69
Overall I thought data would be better. They give a lot of graphs in percentage change. I don't know why. Is it to dull the numbers in comparison to the total number of children numbers. I have know idea why they did not give just a bar graph and then the total year by year. Though the data is there it is not easy to use, and would require backtracking through the numbers to get the yearly totals.
Odd.
Home site for the info
cube
Thursday, July 15, 2004
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment